Thread: october 2014
View Single Post
Old October 16th, 2014, 06:39 PM   #1
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 196
Default october 2014

Finally got round to reading my first ripper book in my new home.

Robert A Snows In Pursuit of Jack the Ripper.

Done as a form of cold case appraisal, this is a pretty succinct book. Just over 200 pages. Very little in the name of speculation here. A pretty good read, if a little dry in places.

Serves as an excellent introduction to the case. Found it to be a good read to re-engage with the case after 3 months off myself. Particularly enjoyed his methodological style of reviewing events, crime scenes, injuries, victims. I felt the suspects chapter added very little to the book - almost as if a publisher had insisted on such a chapter. I did however particularly enjoy the discussion he had relating to the injuries inflicted, & their relation to MO & ritual.

In some places, I felt it was screaming out for more detail. In example, the section on the Stride murder, and the very brief mention of Packer & his "evidence", which isn't really queried as deeply as it should be.

One thing that really stood out for me, was the twice repeated claim that the Dr conducting the inquest into Nichols murder was of the opinion that the mutilations were carried out before the neck was cut, contrary to the popular assertion that throat was cut first. Snow does refer to this twice in the book, yet at one stage appears to contradict it by suggesting that in each case the throat was cut first, then mutilation. I am aware Bond in his overview report for Anderson states in his opinion mutilation happened in each case after death, & after the throat cutting.

But the issue of Nichols being mutilated prior to the throat cut really stood out for me. It may be because I've had 3 months+ off, with loads of busy things going on, but I cannot recall seeing this before. I'm sure I'm probably mistaken, but was this originally the view? Is it generally discredited? I certainly found it to be a fascinating anomoly.
Lemonjelly is offline   Reply With Quote