Jack The Ripper Forums  - Ripperology For The 21st Century  

Go Back   Jack The Ripper Forums - Ripperology For The 21st Century > Persons Of Interest or Actual Suspects > James Maybrick > The Maybrick Diary Forum

The Maybrick Diary Forum Restricted forum for any and all discussion pertaining to the Maybrick Diary.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 11th, 2017, 08:57 AM   #41
Sam Flynn
Owl Catcher
 
Sam Flynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Poster View Post
But does the Width of the lines (the actual strokes) vary at all?
The width doesn't appear to vary much to my eyes, MrP. It seems pretty consistent throughout, with the exception of some ejaculations (tee hee!) like "Bastard" and "MAY".

(I'm working from memory, but I'll double-check when I get home.)
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen"
(F. Nietzsche)

Sam Flynn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 11th, 2017, 12:48 PM   #42
SirRobertAnderson
Researcher / Senior Moderator
 
SirRobertAnderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Noo Yawk
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Butler View Post
To my eye, it certainly looks plausible that it could be Michael disguising his own handwriting, many of the letters are formed in basically the same way.

Somebody hid the book away in Battlecrease house, and Michael would have been one of a very small pool of people with the opportunity to do so. He certainly should not be dismissed as a possible diary author.
I fingered him as a strong candidate for authorship of the Diary at the Liverpool Conference.

Let's put aside the Jack the Ripper stuff in the Diary for a moment and focus on the text outside of JtR.

The Diarist clearly loathes Flo and thinks Michael is rather neato. Michael is smart, Michael knows what to do, etc etc. The Diarist is always thinking about Michael - planning a visit to him, visiting, writing him, thinking about writing him. Considering the brevity of the text it is rather remarkable how much concerns Michael, who in real life thought he was on Byron's level and merited a space in Westminster.

I also raised a simple point: the Diarist doesn't write from a modern viewpoint of the Maybrick Mystery.

Think about it. Consider all books written on the Maybrick case: MacDougall, Levy, Moreland, Ryan, Christie, NBT and Flo's own book. They all view Florence as the victim of a miscarriage of justice.

Yet the Diarist essentially sets her up as his murderer.

It goes again everything a modern forger would have read in his or her voluminous research on the Maybricks.

What else would our intrepid modern forger have learned? That James was an druggie. (BTW I vehemently disagree with this but that is for a future piece. Maybrick was provably critically ill circa 1888 and no doubt even earlier.) None of the "medicine" taken in the Diary is taken for thrills.

It's a rather singular viewpoint to hold. Those books don't paint a flattering picture of Michael and don't make a case for Florence having murdered James.

So.....why did our intrepid modern forger, who has researched the Maybricks intimately, decide to foreshadow the exact accusation that would be leveled at Florence in 1889, and forego painting James as a recreational drug user? It certainly would have made a more exciting tale: the Ripper getting off his rocker on the Victorian equivalent of crystal meth and exacting his vengeance on the "city of whores".
SirRobertAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2018, 06:23 AM   #43
James Johnston
Filmmaker
 
James Johnston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 10
Default

Morning all.

Just thought it might be worth revisiting this thread. There are some questions/areas of interest which I'm keen to read some thoughts on.

With respect to Bruce's book (which was one of the best reads I've had in a long time) I've always been curious as to how the Diary corresponds with the proposed victim count. In his book, Bruce attributes a number of other killings to Michael - and therefore JTR - which are not incorporated into the narrative of the diary. The murder of Jonny Gill in Bradford is just one example. If Michael Maybrick was both JTR and author of the Diary - why are these killings not incorporated into the narrative of the Diary?

I'm also interested in the following from BR: 'Only two things about this document are of any interest to me: 1) The name Maybrick (which the text doesn't actually mention); and 2) Its potent association with Freemasonry (which the text doesn't mention either).

Does the diary's "potent association" with Freemasonry begin and end with its association with JTR and or/Maybrick ?

A recurring theme of BR's book is that "some entity had a reason to disabuse history of the idea that James Maybrick was a Mason at the time of the Ripper." (They All Love Jack, pg.507).

Bruce then recounts his receipt of a letter from the Supreme Council 33 (Ref2412/nrb) on Friday 8th March 2002. I've reproduced the extract below:

"I have myself slightly looked into this matter since you wrote and found that Mike Barratt has confessed on two occasions to forging the diaries, that the writing on the will of Maybrick is considered genuine and different from that of the diaries, and that, the use of the name of the Post House was anachronistic. Also it seems to be generally accepted that Florence Maybrick did not poison her husband. It therefore seems that you are pursuing a matter that has already been discredited." (They All Love Jack, pg.507).

According to BR, this letter seems to have presupposed or preempted the nature of his research: "I'd misguidedly thought the fail-safe tactic for denying any suggestion of a Masonic-Ripper connection was reserved for the Duke of Clarence. I'd expressed no interest in him, and none in Jack either. But never mind that, I'd got answers to questions I had never asked." (They All Love Jack, pg.507).

I'd be interested to read some thoughts on this.

Best, James.
James Johnston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2018, 07:48 AM   #44
Mr. Poster
Twit
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Twit Town
Posts: 2,641
Default

Hi ho

What "potent association" With Freemasonry has the diary (forget Maybrick for a second)?

I never finished Bruces book so cannot recall what he presented as evidence for this association but in all my years on diary threads Ive never seen anyone argue that there was anything intrinsically masonic about the diray or its text....

P
__________________
"Chance hasn't yet peached on Jack the Ripper.If she ever does, it will probably be cause for grotesque disappointment among the Ripperologists, who get as much joy from attacking one another's lunacies, as from any problems originally posed by the Whitechapel murderer" R. Gowers, The Independant, Saturday, 31 December 1994
Mr. Poster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2018, 12:32 PM   #45
SirRobertAnderson
Researcher / Senior Moderator
 
SirRobertAnderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Noo Yawk
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Johnston View Post
With respect to Bruce's book (which was one of the best reads I've had in a long time) I've always been curious as to how the Diary corresponds with the proposed victim count. In his book, Bruce attributes a number of other killings to Michael - and therefore JTR - which are not incorporated into the narrative of the diary. The murder of Jonny Gill in Bradford is just one example. If Michael Maybrick was both JTR and author of the Diary - why are these killings not incorporated into the narrative of the Diary?
You and I might be in a minority of two with respect to They All Love Jack. I really enjoyed it.

But as I said on the Transcript thread, Bruce made a major error in not addressing the Diary and Watch head on. They are the elephants in the room when discussing anything Maybrick.

You know my answer to your question, though. Michael authored the Diary and he wasn't JtR and he didn't kill Gill. Just a severely twisted man with a major ax to grind with respect to Flo.

It is very hard for me to get around the issue that the Diary doesn't read the way you'd think for something obviously written after Flo's trial.
SirRobertAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2018, 06:01 PM   #46
Chris G.
Registered User
 
Chris G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 12,675
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
If Michael was the author, then he was brilliant at disguising his handwriting, which is possible I suppose. In all sincerity, I see no resemblance between the two.

Attachment 18134

The formation of the letters aside, Michael Maybrick's writing actually looks like that of an adult. The diary's writing, by contrast, could easily be that of a teenager. I'm not saying that a kid wrote the diary; it's just an informal way of categorising the two styles.
The other thing to be said is that Michael Maybrick was a man of erudition. He was a recognized composer and singer, composing and performing under the name of Stephen Adams. It seems hard to square those facts with whomever wrote the Diary. Would Michael really write "I took refreshment. . ." or any other odd turns of phrase in the Diary?
__________________
Christopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
For complete information about RipperCon in Baltimore,
April 7-8, 2018, go to http://rippercon.com/[/URL]
2 days of talks & 2 days of tours, April 6 to April 9!
Places still available.
Don't Miss Out on the Only North American
Conference on the Whitechapel Murders
in the 130th Anniversary Year of the Crimes
Chris G. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2018, 07:45 PM   #47
Paul Butler
Who?
 
Paul Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Devon.
Posts: 880
Default

Michael never performed using the name Stephen Adams, Chris. He used his real name.
Paul Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2018, 11:58 PM   #48
SirRobertAnderson
Researcher / Senior Moderator
 
SirRobertAnderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Noo Yawk
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris G. View Post
The other thing to be said is that Michael Maybrick was a man of erudition. He was a recognized composer and singer, composing and performing under the name of Stephen Adams. It seems hard to square those facts with whomever wrote the Diary. Would Michael really write "I took refreshment. . ." or any other odd turns of phrase in the Diary?
Florid and melodramatic prose from a megalomaniac MM? Perish the thought.
SirRobertAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2018, 04:15 AM   #49
Paul Butler
Who?
 
Paul Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Devon.
Posts: 880
Default

Chris. I'm puzzled as to why the perfectly ordinary phrase "I took refreshment....." should bother you?
Paul Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright @ Howard & Nina Brown 2015-2022