Jack The Ripper Forums  - Ripperology For The 21st Century  

Go Back   Jack The Ripper Forums - Ripperology For The 21st Century > The Victims > The Pinchin Street Torso

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 5th, 2017, 12:27 PM   #1
Jerry Dunlop
Information Extractor
 
Jerry Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 1,419
Default Why leave the arms?

I've been pondering this question lately in regard to the Pinchin torso. If the Pinchin torso was one in a series with the Rainham, Whitehall and Jackson torsos, why did the killer in this one instance decide to leave the arms on the victim, unlike the others in the series where he removed arms and legs? It seems this killer had the time to remove the arms if he wanted to.

Any ideas?
Jerry Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 5th, 2017, 01:42 PM   #2
Pipeman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 75
Default

Good question Jerry. Why the dismembering in the first place? Was it to hide id? If so, very successful. Could the arms being left have something to do with the disposal? I imagine the arms may have been removed in some cases because of the way the killer planned to package the body parts? There isn't much reason to remove the arms in terms of identification purposes, unless there is an identifying mark or fingerprints.
Pipeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 5th, 2017, 04:27 PM   #3
Chris G.
Registered User
 
Chris G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 12,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Dunlop View Post
I've been pondering this question lately in regard to the Pinchin torso. If the Pinchin torso was one in a series with the Rainham, Whitehall and Jackson torsos, why did the killer in this one instance decide to leave the arms on the victim, unlike the others in the series where he removed arms and legs? It seems this killer had the time to remove the arms if he wanted to.

Any ideas?
Possibly because it wasn't the same killer as the man responsible for the Rainham, Whitehall and Jackson cases?
__________________
Christopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon 2018 in Baltimore
http://blog.casebook.org/chrisgeorge
For info about RipperCon in Baltimore, MD,
April 7-8, 2018, go to http://rippercon.com/
Chris G. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 5th, 2017, 09:04 PM   #4
Anna Morris
Registered User
 
Anna Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 3,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Dunlop View Post
I've been pondering this question lately in regard to the Pinchin torso. If the Pinchin torso was one in a series with the Rainham, Whitehall and Jackson torsos, why did the killer in this one instance decide to leave the arms on the victim, unlike the others in the series where he removed arms and legs? It seems this killer had the time to remove the arms if he wanted to.

Any ideas?
I don't think there is any way to think of one good reason but there are things to think about. I would think size and weight of the victim might figure in. If a female victim was very small with petite arms and the remains could be packaged in a small bundle, maybe it was not worthwhile to remove the arms.
__________________
If the shawl doesn't fit, you must acquit.~~Henry Flower, Casebook post
Anna Morris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 08:31 AM   #5
Robert Linford
Researcher Extraordinaire
 
Robert Linford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 18,920
Default

Maybe he had to change lodgings quickly.
Robert Linford is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 08:42 AM   #6
Mr. Poster
Twit
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Twit Town
Posts: 2,619
Default

Its easier to move a torso that has arms attached.

They are heavy, slippery and you get stains on your shirt if you dont have arms to grab.

A slippery 30-40 kg torso is not an easy thing to get to grips with so arms are handy.

P
__________________
"Chance hasn't yet peached on Jack the Ripper.If she ever does, it will probably be cause for grotesque disappointment among the Ripperologists, who get as much joy from attacking one another's lunacies, as from any problems originally posed by the Whitechapel murderer" R. Gowers, The Independant, Saturday, 31 December 1994
Mr. Poster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 08:49 AM   #7
Robert Linford
Researcher Extraordinaire
 
Robert Linford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 18,920
Default

Yes Lars but he could have left, say, six inches of arms attached, then used the armpits to move the torso.
Robert Linford is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 08:52 AM   #8
Mr. Poster
Twit
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Twit Town
Posts: 2,619
Default

Indeed Robert....but a couple of feet of arm has to be more convenient than some kind of stumps?

You can drag a torso by the arms without even bending over. A couple of stumps still necessitates some inconvenience.

P
__________________
"Chance hasn't yet peached on Jack the Ripper.If she ever does, it will probably be cause for grotesque disappointment among the Ripperologists, who get as much joy from attacking one another's lunacies, as from any problems originally posed by the Whitechapel murderer" R. Gowers, The Independant, Saturday, 31 December 1994
Mr. Poster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 08:58 AM   #9
Robert Linford
Researcher Extraordinaire
 
Robert Linford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 18,920
Default

OK Lars, the murderer suffered from lumbago.
Robert Linford is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 6th, 2017, 09:17 AM   #10
Mr. Poster
Twit
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Twit Town
Posts: 2,619
Default

Why do people think that just because you are a murderer you are willing to over exert yourself ?

P
__________________
"Chance hasn't yet peached on Jack the Ripper.If she ever does, it will probably be cause for grotesque disappointment among the Ripperologists, who get as much joy from attacking one another's lunacies, as from any problems originally posed by the Whitechapel murderer" R. Gowers, The Independant, Saturday, 31 December 1994
Mr. Poster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright @ Howard & Nina Brown 2015-2022